编者按Editor's Note
摘要(Abstract)：
<正>“法律意识”是法社科研究中一个重要的研究议题。它既是一个成熟的研究领域,也具有开放的、变动着的研究传统,其分析对象和研究方法经历了——而且正在经历——多次争议与变革。苏珊·西尔贝~((1))是法律意识研究的领军者,其作品横跨法律社会学、法律人类学、法律与科技等多个领域。她不仅以《法律的公共空间》一书开创了法律意识研究的日常转向,近来亦积极推动该概念在职业情境中的应用。为此,我们专门对话了西尔贝教授,邀请她谈谈自己的研究历程。为了帮助读者进一步了解法律意识研究和她的研究,我们还翻译了《法律意识之后》。这篇文章全面梳理了英文学界法律意识研究的脉络和局限,展现了这一概念广阔的解释潜力。
关键词(KeyWords)：
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author):
参考文献(References)：
- (1)苏珊·西尔贝,美国麻省理工学院莱昂和安妮·戈德堡人文、社会学与人类学教授。问答及文章《法律意识之后》的翻译均由巴黎政治学院社会学硕士研究生孔思尧完成。由于篇幅所限,文章部分注释有所删减,全文分两次发表。
- (1)See Patricia Ewick and Susan S.Silbey,Looking for Hegemony in All the Wrong Places:Critique,Context and Collectivities in Studies of Legal Consciousness,in Jiri Priban eds.,Research Handbook on the Sociology of Law Edward Elgar Publishers,2020,pp.163-176。似是出于编辑需要,该手册将此文标题改为了Sociology of Legal Conscousness and Hegemony。为阅读便利起见,答复中写明的文献出版信息将在脚注中列出。——译者注
- (2)See Susan S.Silbey,J.Locke,Op.Cit.:Invocations of Law on Snowy Streets,5 Journal of Comparative Law 66(2010);Susan S.Silbey,Ideology,Power and Justice,in Bryant G.Garth and Austin Sarat eds.,Power and Justice in Sociolegal Studies,Northwestern University Press,1998,pp.272-308.
- (1)See Patricia Ewick and Susan S.Silbey,Subversive Stories and Hegemonic Tales:Toward a Sociology of Narrative,29 Law&Society Review 197(1995);Patricia Ewick and Susan S.Silbey,Narrating Social Structure:Stories of Resistance to Legal Authority,108 The American Journal of Sociology 1328(2003).
- (1)See Gokce Basbug,Cavicchi Ayn and Susan S.Silbey,Rank Has Its Privileges:Explain-ing Why Laboratory Safety is A Persistent Challenge,184 Journal of Business Ethics 571(2023).
- (2)See Garry C.Gray and Susan S.Silbey,Governing Inside the Organization:Interpreting Regulation and Compliance,120 The American Journal of Sociology 96(2014).
- (3)See Susan S.Silbey,Why Do Biologists and Chemists Do Safety Differently?The Reproduction of Cultural Variation through Pragmatic Regulation,in Neil L.Gross,Isaac Ariail Reed and Christopher Winship eds.,The New Pragmatist Sociology:Inquiry,Agency,and Democracy,Columbia University Press,2022,pp.256-304.
- (4)See Jonathan Rauch,The Constitution of Knowledge:A Defense of Truth,Brookings Institution Press,2021.
- (1)See Jodi L.Short et al.,The Dog That Didn't Bark:Looking for Techno-Libertarian Ideology in a Decade of Public Discourse about Big Tech Regulation,19 The Ohio State Technology Law Journal 1,(2023).